Facial Tattoos in film

topic posted Sun, October 15, 2006 - 5:08 PM by  Dark
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
I know there are countless examples of facial tattoos in film, and most of them not very favourable examples. But how great is it to see them in a respected way in X-Men 3?

Callisto: You're so proud of being a mutant? Where's your mark?

Some people might not see Callisto and her Morlocks as positive characters, or their marks as beautiful, but it appears at least, that THEY find their marks to be beautiful. One of the underlying conflicts and ironies in the comics between X-Men and Morlocks, is that both groups are mutants. However, the X-Men (when they first met the Morlocks at least) could always pass for human and function in our world. --sometimes with the aid of hologram disguises, but that's another issue between them--

The Morlocks however, were "marked" and that's why they stayed underground. In the comics, they were marked because of their heavy mutation, something they couldn't choose. The movie uses facial tattoos, most likely because it's millions of dollars cheaper than making several CGI mutated persons, but it changes their dynamic. Now, it's their decision. Their choice to distinguish themselves as mutants--as "other."

Now, I'm not a mutant. But I am "other." And when I got my face tattooed, that was something I felt, the idea of putting out to the world that I am not a part of it.

How do we feel about this?
posted by:
Dark
Portland
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Facial Tattoos in film

    Tue, October 17, 2006 - 9:55 PM
    Well, sorry to nitpick, but actually the Morlock's appearance in the original comic book canon was more complex, as I recall. While many of them were born with visible mutations, most of them were not. There was an early member named Masque, who was horribly disfgured with massive bodywide scarring and was of indeterminate gender. Masque had the power to change others' shapes permanently. Hair, skin, body structure, you name it, even gender. The irony was that Masque could not change his/her own deformity in the least.

    When you joined the Morlocks, which was more like an underground band of refugees and homeless people than the political group shown in the movie, you were required to have Masque change you, always into a form which made it difficult to interact with the normal humans on the surface. This showed your degree of committment to the cause of mutant seperatism, and removed the inherent split between human looking and non-human looking mutants. Some of these changes were fairly minor, like green hair; some were more upfront, like facial tattoos; others were bodywide structural changes.

    I think this is particularly interesting for the bodmod community. I can't tell you how many people have told me their mods are a sort of filter, keeping the closeminded people away, echoing the seperatism of the Morlocks. Conversely, how many I have heard expend a great deal of energy trying to prove that modded people are just like everyone else, ala the X-Men. I guess every movement has it's seperatist extremists and it's integrationist moderates. Malcom X and MLK, for example.

    And, yes, before you ask, I am the geekiest man on the planet.
    • Re: Facial Tattoos in film

      Wed, October 18, 2006 - 12:24 PM
      Ohhhh, wow. I knew that Masque did that (Callisto's new tentacle look is pretty fierce), but, huh, ok. Whenever they bring back Morlocks, it doesn't seem like this is how they chose to look, but that's really interesting to know. Thank you.

Recent topics in "facial tats"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Reaction to Facial Tats Unsubscribed 2 November 10, 2009
Tongue Tattoos- Tattoos on Your Tongue Tanay Kumar 1 June 13, 2009
New pics 1 January 5, 2009
LOOKING FOR A TATTOO ARTIST FOR MY FACE Steve 0 March 11, 2008